History of Acquisition Training

So this week we studied blended learning and because I am such a nerd, the historical aspect of this subject really caught my attention. The fact that correspondence courses started in 1728 spoke volumes to me.  I have told everyone I have come across all weekend.  Not a lot of people, but enough.  It may be on the news.

I think that most people know that I work for the Ohio Army National Guard and have for almost 30 years. So I remember my office before computers and computer based training.  My first acquisition class was a correspondence course.  I got a book to study and my boss got a test for me to take, which I did and barely passed.  The military people studied a lot through correspondence courses.  I would see these yellow staple-bound books and knew that they were doing military correspondence training.  (They weren’t supposed to be doing it their desk, but… maybe that’s why the books were bright yellow, you could not hide them!)

In the early nineties, Congress passed the Defense Acquisition Workforce Improvement Act (DAWIA) which put education and certification requirements on buyers and contracting people within DoD. DAWIA also created the Defense Acquisition University (DAU), where we could get the training and continuing education opportunities required.  Early attempts at continuing education consisted of VCR tapes that we would pop in during lunch to learn a new process or just refresh us on an old process.  DAU quickly moved to CD’s, and then DVD’s and now have a full library of online continuing education modules to choose from.  I guess my point is that they have evolved with the times.  If you compare the timeline for the infographic at http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2012/02/23/300-years-of-distance-learning/ with the progression of DAU, I think you will find a very parallel path.  Thanks!

Advertisements

What is Fair Use and Open-Ness?

I heard about my degree program from a boy who was dating my daughter.  He was a junior when they started dating and he would talk about the program he was in and when I started at Ohio State, I switched my major from a straight business degree to this program, Corporate Training and Development.  I say all that to set a stage.  My first semester in school and I am in one of my core classes.  This class has a major project assignment that goes all semester long, with partial deliverables and one big deliverable at the end.  As the class went on I would talk to this boy as he had been through this before.  One of my partial deliverables did not receive a very good grade and I asked for his help because I obviously wasn’t understanding the project requirements.  As he worked with me through the project, he came to realize that the instructor was using his final deliverable as one of a group of “good” samples for our class.  It had been sanitized, his name was not on the document, but he recognized his work.  He was rankled, but he did not pursue any action with the instructor or the College of Education and Human Ecology.

So I guess this is about fair use and “open-ness” gone wrong?  How open is open?  Who did that work belong to?  The student who created it or the school he turned it into?  What could he have done if he did decide to pursue it?  What would have happened? I really don’t know the answers to any of these questions but it really does give me something to think about.  I am a big proponent of not “recreating the wheel” at my job and I use previously created letters and memos for file all the time.  I realize the rules are different because I work for the Federal Government but the behaviors are the same.  You just have to be very careful to make sure you know the parameters of your situation, whether it be school, work or anytime you might be using something you found on the internet.

Defense Acquisition University

The educational resource I chose to evaluate is the Defense Acquisition University or DAU.  I know this website is very specific to Federal Employees, but I currently work in Contracting for the National Guard and would like to train new contract specialist‘s after I retire from the Guard, so this forum is in line with my future aspirations.

A very small part of my current job is the on-the-job training of new contract specialist.  This website is the first place I turn to.  The contracting career training path includes required certification training (held at DAU locations) and continuous learning points (eighty for every two years).  Both of those are on the DAU website, registration for a residence course and computer based training if a residence course is not available.  The website also offers a limited learning management system, where your DAU certificates are kept and you can request a transcript of your courses.  They also offer knowledge sharing and best practices for the journeyman contract specialist, logistician, auditor or program manager.

The copyright policy is posted right on the website “All publications appearing on the DAU Web site are works of the U.S. government (prepared by an officer or employee, including contractors, of the U.S. government as part of official duties or contract) unless otherwise noted. Works of the U.S. government are not subject to U.S. copyright laws and, therefore, can be reproduced in whole or in part. Credit must be given to DAU and to the author(s) of all reproduced publications.”  I have used articles from DAU in my on-the-job training role, always giving the credit where it is due.